Who Funded the Study?

The six authors of a recently published research paper titled “Decision Rightness and Emotional Responses to Abortion in the United States: A Longitudinal Study” asserted that “the authors have declared that no competing interest exists.”

That is a blatant lie.

All six of them are on the faculty of or otherwise associated with the pro-abortion University of California San Francisco, its pro-abortion Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, and the organization ANSIRH – Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health. None of them has ever published a study that painted abortion in an unfavorable light. At least one of the authors has been a paid consultant to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

The “Decision Rightness”study was funded by the Wallace Alexander Gerbode Foundation, which has also granted money to NARAL, the ACLU and seemingly every group they could find with the word “choice” in its name: Medical students, law student, physicians, nurses, etc.

Another grant was received by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, which is dedicated to reducing population. From the foundation website: The Population and Reproductive Health program seeks to promote women’s reproductive health and rights and to stabilize population growth.

The third grant that funded “Decision Rightness” was from an anonymous donor, and after reading the study, I conjured an image of Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards writing a personal check. But perhaps she’s being more careful with her $590,000 annual salary these days, now that Planned Parenthood’s baby-parts-for-sale scheme has been exposed.

But back to the study.

This latest exercise in proving that abortion is fabulous followed 667 women for three years after their abortions, checking in by phone twice every year, and sending them each a $50 gift card after each conversation. The conclusion: “Women experienced decreasing emotional intensity over time, and the overwhelming majority of women felt that termination was the right decision for them over three years. Emotional support may be beneficial for women having abortions who report intended pregnancies or difficulty deciding.”

What they’re saying, basically, is that if you’re fine with your abortion decision beforehand, you will be fine after. But at the Silent No More Awareness Campaign and at Rachel’s Vineyard, we beg to differ. Between the two ministries we have been in contact with, ministered to and marched beside more than 3,000 women who not only regret their abortions but do so publicly after going through post-abortion recovery programs.

Many of them speak of an initial feeling of relief that gives way over time – sometimes a decade or more – to much darker emotions and accompanying masking behaviors like alcohol and drug abuse, sexual promiscuity, eating disorders and other problems. Sometimes the child they aborted will be the only one they ever conceive.

Post-abortion healing programs like Rachel’s Vineyard and dozens of others would not exist if women were not experiencing emotional turmoil after abortion.

We don’t expect honesty from pro-abortion researchers, and we are not surprised when the pro-abortion mainstream media runs headlines like this one in Time magazine: Hardly Any Women Regret Having an Abortion, a New Study Finds.

But the danger in this skewed research and slanted reporting is that it gives abortion-vulnerable women, especially young women, another reason to make the wrong choice.

We don’t need a study to confirm what we see every day: Women do regret abortion.

3 Responses to “Who Funded the Study?”

  1. charmaine bull says:

    Thank you for posting this.
    My daughter is so snowed by these people.
    It hurts to see her so deceived by the liberal world.
    All I can do is pray.

  2. I am dismayed by the tone of this post and by the tone of almost all the “pro-life” rhetoric of the Church and her ministers. If we want abortions to end, we must use love to end them, as Christ used love to change everything. When we engage in a loving way with those with whom we disagree, we allow for Grace. When we demonize from the get go, we have already lost them. What do we really want? To be RIGHT, or to solve the problem? Our strategy is not getting us what we want. We can do better.

  3. Stephen Durnan says:

    I agree the Study is comparable to the Studies by Big Tabaco, indicating that nicotine was non-addictive, and that smoking was not detrimental to one’s health, and that there was no proven link to cancer: and they produced studies to refute other studies they did not like.

    I will pray for your daughter, the horrible thing is that so many are so deceived. I will never pay taxes to the USGov to fund Planned parenthood, and no I have not subscribed to Obamacare insurance, and the government forcing Catholic hospitals to close, and Catholic Adoption Agencies to Close.

    evil is as evil does, but even fallen angels in their fallen-glory can deceive in their appearance, and their works can appear fair in semblance, but contain darkness in the veil of fair words.

    All our prays.

Leave a Reply

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing